And thank goddess someone is volunteering, because I almost snorted coffee through my nose in comical understanding
at Ojos co-founder Munjal Shah's explanation of why this company exists: "I am co-founding a company because I found I
had 31,246 photos all named DSC0009.jpg." Ojos is using face and text recognition technology to automagically tag the
vast sea of unsorted digital images in your collection. I post only a subset of the digital photos I take to
Flickr — ones that I like for aesthetic reasons, or ones that capture a
particular moment or event in some way. The rest of the shots… well, they lie in ignominious anonymity in the
unchartered areas of my "Photos" folder. If Ojos could take them, have its way with them, and spit back a useful data
set — that's going to be absolutely golden.
My worries are threefold: 1) what about the potential to "do wrong," to actually mislabel photos as things they are
not? Too many errors and the cost of having to fix those will outweigh the benefit of the tagging as a whole. 2) How
well will it deal with ambiguity? Will it correctly identify my obtuse abstracts? Will it recognize my friends dressed
up for Halloween? 3) Seems like there's an ultimately limited potential to "do right." Many of the tags I use on Flickr
aren't so much descriptive as… well, poetic. I want to see the photos I've tagged as "spring" or "love" or "home" more
than I find myself needing to see photos I've tagged as "bicycle" or "building." I suppose we'll see, as soon as my
knock-knock-knocking on beta's door pays off… :)
[Via Tech Crunch]









1. The phrase "auto-tag" really caught my attention here. Personally, I think that autotagging (of both photos and video) will become even more important once our now ubiquitous cameraphones become capable of recording high-quality video, creating terabytes of data to be tagged and stored. I've expanded upon these ideas in a blog post about Ojos, available here:
http://mashable.com/?p=17
Posted at 8:05PM on Dec 18th 2005 by Mashable