This is some pretty promising stuff — the new incarnation of Memeorandum is an automated tech and politics blog news aggregator that hopes to keep an up-to-the-minute
snapshot of what's hot in the blogosphere. The new code has only been public for a few days, so the sample size is
still low — but from what I've checked out so far, I'm genuinely impressed. The biggest caveat is that it's only
tracking technology and politics — but within those domains it stands to be an incredibly useful tool for quickly
getting a feel for what's going on in those spaces, right at that moment. Essentially, stories that get linked most
frequently rise to the top, then sink down again as they're replaced by newer, hotter stories. The algorithm favors
posts with some meat on their bones, and disfavors blog posts that are quick one-liners linking to something
else.
What's particularly interesting to me are the way
conversations are prioritized in
the interface. For each story, you also get information on who else is talking about that meme. You can set preferences
to show the related discussion links by default, or toggle the view manually when you want to see them. This is
excellent because it gives you a concise overview of who else is talking about the same thing — and because each
conversation entry is listed with the blog author and blog title as well as the post title, you really get some idea of
who is doing the talking. It's not quite a
conversation cloud in visual representation, but it
is a step towards grokking something about the higher order picture of the blogosphere — who is talking to
whom, about what. Creator of the site Gabe Rivera has some
words on why Memeorandum exists on his
blog, including this bit about the conversation emphasis: "most news sites do very little to relate the form of
conversations unfolding in real time. Some seem to deny that a conversation is even occurring. I want memeorandum to be
a clear exception." I'm hoping this is just one of an eventual plethora of tools that starts to address this problem of
valuing conversation on the
web.
[Via Read/Write Web]









1. Glad you see the value, Barb, and I think you make some good points.
Even am I'm trying to focus on "news" that passive (non-blogging) readers can appreciate, I would say alot of the software is very much social software, divining all sorts of implicit data from what the participants are saying and linking to.
I hope the conversation in news and analysis continues to get richer. Imagine how good the politics site would be were lawmakers and policymakers actively listening and blogging. Or the Tech page if more innovators and CEOs participate...
Posted at 8:05PM on Dec 18th 2005 by Gabe