It looks like Clay Shirky beat me to this, but I swear I started composing this one the other day.
Sharing information via the web is enabled by more than just blogging tools. There are a whole host of tools that are making publishing, searching, bookmarking, archiving content and annotating the web a social pastime.
Clay mentions that the social bookmarking idea isn't new, but is definitely worth revisiting:
I'm fascinated with the way that a bunch of old ideas floating around from the dot com era are back, and now succeeding. Many of these apps are explicitly social, and are benefitting from the larger user population and increased comfort…
Amen!
Like Clay, the only tool from this group that I heartily recommend is del.icio.us. It is also the only one that I use regularly.
Clay mentions BackFlip as the predecessor of all of these tools. But, I'd go as far as saying that directories (e.g. yahoo, dmoz, zeal) are the earliest predecessors. Now that storage costs are lower, there is no reason to limit the number of editors, though. Thus, anyone can be an editor and annotator of the web.
Group Publishing
Wikis are very popular. Unlike blogging, though, multiple authors can edit each other's words, unrestrained.
Since wikis allow multiple authors and group editing, they make collective- centralized-knowledge creation happen.
Because of its centralized location and common goal of creating an authoritative source, wikis make information from
multiple authors much more digestable than navigating weblogs.
The best known example of a wiki is wikipedia, an online encyclopedia. And the best known vendor of this software is Ross Mayfield's company, socialtext.
Via Joi Ito, Stephanie Booth writes about how wikis can be used for real time conference note taking…
Still in the "team theme", different roles can be taken by the note-takers: sometimes there is a main note-taker (I noticed this had a tendancy to happen when people wrote long sentences, but there might be other factors – any theories on this welcome), sometimes a few people "share" the main note-taking. Some people will correct typos, and rearrange formatting, adding titles, indenting, adding outside links. Some people add personal comments, notes, questions. Others try to round up more participants or spend half a talk fighting with wiki pages.
Social Bookmarking
Del.icio.us rocks. It is my main bookmarking tool. Users can
share their bookmarks publicly on the web; use a javascript
bookmarklet tool to bookmark a page in one click, categorize bookmarks under multiple categories and type their
own short description for the bookmark. All these features make backflip look
like DOS.
Archiving tools
Spurl vs Furl. Not sure what came first,
but there aren't a lot of differences between these two. There are some differences in implementation: Furl has a
toolbar and spurl uses a browser button for MS IE users. After a quick trial, I'd say furl gets a better
rating on usability. But, I've talked with the founder of Spurl, and he is definitely on the right track. And both
of these tools allow people to archive single pages of content. So, instead of just storing the link to it, you can
store the page. Like I said, I don't use these tools. Does anyone? For what purpose?
Annotation Tools
Gibeo is the only example of web-annotation tools that I
know exists. Gibeo brings the wiki to the world-wide-web. The screen-capture on the left shows how users can hightlight
text, and leave a comment for the next Gibeo user to view. Gibeo allows anyone to annotate and share their thoughts,
simply by highlighting text and typing away. When another person visits the page, they can view what the other 3rd
parties have said. I imagine this'd be ideal for teams of web designers or web developers working on a project. Instead
of using a fancy bug tracking tool. Just annotate the page. And the person responsible can simply go to the page and
address the issue. (The annotated
page was found here.)
What other uses could this tool have?
Social Searching
Eurekster brings us social searching. It enables us to share our
searches with different groups of people. It combines
realcontact's contact management system with technology that remembers our
searches and what we found interesting. And then, when one of our contacts searches about a certain topic, the
previously clicked-on results are presented at the top. For more info on eurekster, read a
blog I started when eurekster launched, or join the
social software group
I started on Eurekster.
Eurekster's site is certainly not as popular as "We
Three Kings Search Engine
Providers", but with partnerships with major social networking sites, like their
partnership with friendster, they are
certainly a search provider to watch.









1. i've used and tested both furl and spurl, actually interviewed both mike giles (founder of furl) and hjalmar gislason (founder of spurl) for both passingnotes and the society of competitive intelligence professionals...both interviews are now up in full text at http://www.passingnotes.com
SPURL interview (which talks about Furl as well) is at:
http://www.passingnotes.com/index.php/interview-hjalmar-gislason-and-the-egress-of-spurlnet/
FURL review (which is much more technical) is at:
http://www.passingnotes.com/index.php/furlnet-say-farewell-to-blogs-and-bookmarks-and-get-your-furl-on/
as for major comparison: it's about collaborative build versus personal build, to keep it simple. spurl is focused on collaboration, furl is focused on personal build - both offer potential to 'turn the other way' but the underlying theme is a bit different...even if the names are shockingly similar...
Posted at 8:20PM on Dec 18th 2005 by David